Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Month in Review: September, 2011

Ah, another month shot to Hell.

So, where are we?  Ah, yes, it's been a very strange little month.  Since I've cut back on the daily ... and weekly ... output, it's been interesting.  I don't even though I've gotten around to posting a music blog in a while.


So start with, we opened the month with a new concept from August: Characters answering Surveys.  In this case, I used Scott Murphy.

Then I looked into how terror can also be a form of communication: sometimes, the most intimidating characters are the ones you least expect. And, sometimes, they're just in your face.

Then there was how to torture characters: with some Masks, some JMS, and some Jim Butcher.  Muwhahahahaha!!!!!

Yes, I've been having too much fun around here.

Can you tell?

Speaking of which, there was also my Impossible Odds blog, focusing on million to one odds, and Talisman.


Anyway, there was also another Self Defense review.  In this case, I covered how I spent my 9-11; mostly it was learning how to save a life.... no, I'm not joking.  How to save someone from chokes, and guns, and knives.  I also covered the latest in bulletproof clothing, and how to spot a concealed weapon, and such ...

Oh, and I also looked back on September 11, 2001.

Also: DC Comics rebooted their universe, and I'm not that happy about it. Though I'm told I'm dead wrong.

I did a review of The Expendables..... The Pain! The Pain!

And, there was Talk like a Pirate Day, where I got to be lazy ... in other words, I had nothing for that day, and I was saved by the realization it was September 19th.

And, finally, we had the return of Karina Fabian, discussing her new book Mind Over Mind. She gave us Ten Reasons to Love Science Fiction, an interview, and my review of the novel.

Anyway, I thought this was a good, fun little month.

And I've already started on the blogs for October.

Enjoy, all.


By the way, before you leave, check out some of our sponsers' ads ... please. We can use the money. :)

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

How I spent my 9-11: a self defense review.

You all might remember I've had two previous self defense reviews. One, when I first started my job at Examiner.com, and another a little more recently, which covered current events all over the place.

This one may be a little more laid back.

In retrospect, I should have mentioned the Krav Maga seminar, on September 11th, 2011. But, to be honest, I didn't know how many people here would have been interested.


However, never fear: I did a four-part review of it for Examiner.com anyway.

There was one part that reviewed how to use The Stop Kick to nail someone charging a third party, even though they may be armed. Trust me, I got kicked in the chest so often, my teeth rattled, and I had a shield.

You do this to an actual attacker, it's gonna suck to be them.


Then there was the choke... in this case, "the choke" is just a simple matter of t-rex arms.... you'll see what I mean.

And, of course, there is the inevitable gun defense.

And learning how to take down a guy holding someone hostage.

And, there's the latest in fashion: Bulletproof clothing.

When Examiner.com suggested I try something to do with 9-11 .... well, I did my best, and called it, simply, New York ten years after 9/11. Original, no?



Some people like to discuss how they can be perfectly safe ... I mention it here: How can I be perfectly safe? Again, another original title.

I briefly talked about How to spot a concealed weapon, a fun little article.

And ... well, there was a little incident lately in NYC's West Indian Parade, which led me to discuss Surviving a shootout, and an encounter with the NYPD

That one's a long story, I think.

And, that is it.

Although it has occurred to me: if anyone has an actual question about self-defense, feel free to ask in the comments below.  I'll be sure to try and answer you.

Be safe, all.

Monday, September 26, 2011

Impossible Odds: From Masada to Talisman

"Whether it's the Trojan War, the Battle of Thermopylae, or the Last Stand at the Alamo, many of the famous battles in history were sieges in which small forces took on much larger armies. Unfortunately, sieges don't make good stories because the smaller force won. They make the history books because the little guys fought well, before they died." ~Michael Westen, Burn Notice. Last stand, Ep 4.18
I like thousand to one odds.  Love 'em.  Can't get enough of them. Make it an intelligent war, I'm with you all the way.

300 Spartans (with about 10,000+ other Greeks) versus one hundred thousand (or a million, depending who you ask) Persian Imperial forces?*  I'm there.

Nearly seven hundred Jewish rebels vs. a Roman legion at Masada?** I'm with you ...

The Alamo ... Okay, not so much, but I'm more familiar with the players involved, and I can't say that I liked any of them, on any side.

A hundred thousand Orcs of Mordor versus Gondor? That's at least worth an Academy Award....

In my own writing, I have a tendency to give the bad guys the upper hand as much as possible.  I try not to leave it as a matter of "evil badguy gains upper hand because he's using underhandd methods, while virtuous goodguy never sinks so low." Anyone who had read even one my self defense articles knows better.  When in doubt, bite a nose off, pull at an ear, gouge the eyes, and, of course, kick 'em in the groin, whenever possible.  My characters fight like their lives depend on it, usually because it does.

No, when I give the bad guys the upper hand, it's because they either have better training, better equipment, more people, or all of the above.

That's when I whip out The Anarchist's Cookbook, and go to work.  Because when my characters are out-manned  outgunned, outmaneuvered, and when things have stopped looking grim and have moved on to "we're all going to die" ....

That's when my characters get smart, get sneaky, and become very, very dangerous.

[More below the break]


Wednesday, September 21, 2011

"Suffer characters suffer!" Jim Butcher, JMS, Masks.

I love screwing around with my characters, about as much as I like messing around with my audience.

Over time, we've talked about who can you trust in A Pius Man, how I like to keep my characters vague ... sometimes the most vague being the one who is the most blunt.

Now, I didn't get into writing to be a sadist of my own personal playthings. Unlike some authors, like J. Michael Straczynski, I don't "torture my characters." In some cases, like JMS, he does it literally.

And guys like Jim Butcher have literally said "Suffer characters, suffer!" in describing his writing style.  Back at DragonCon, he practically leaped at the microphone when asked about beating up on characters, and said "I'll take that one."

In my case, I just enjoy giving them mental problems that confuse the hell out of them.

And, also in my case, I like throwing in a love story, just to screw with some of them.

[More below the break]

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

DVD Review: The Expendables


I've done some book reviews here and there, so I thought I would try my hand at DVDs.

Since this blog does cover things that blow up, I would start at the most likely candidate.

The Expendables.

You may have seen the ads: this movie has practically every major action star in the last thirty years: Ahh-nuld (Arnold Schwarzenegger) and Bruce Willis in bit parts, with main roles filled by Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Jet Li, Dolph Lundgen, with Mickey Rourke fresh off of the set of Iron Man 2, if his hair is to be any judge.

When one starts viewing, you know from the beginning that this isn't going to be a great work of art, or even a lot of great acting. This isn't Shakespeare, but we can at least hope for something around the level of a good Schwarzenegger movie (remember those? I think the last one starred Vanessa Williams and James Caan).

If you're expecting a stellar review of this movie, turn back now.

(More below the break)

Monday, September 19, 2011

Talk like a pirate day ... Or, how to be a lazy blogger


Today is talk like a pirate day!  Which means what, exactly?


Which means that it's a great excuse for me to be completely lazy, and post pirate stuff.



And use a lot of R's.



How cheat?  Well, you all remember the APM story of The Pirate King, right?  Well, if you don't, you might want to check out how I would deal with pirates of the Caribbean .... okay, Somali pirates, but what the heck.  It's one of the complete stories of A Pius Man, constantly updated for your amusement.



We also have flashbacks to the Wiki Pirates, Harry Potter and the Pirate Queen, and, of course, explaining what the heck Talk like a Pirate Day actually is.



Like I said, lazy blogging 101.



Enjoy, all.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Review: Mind Over Mind, by Karina Fabian




For those of you who missed yesterday's interview with guest Karina Fabian, the author of Mind Over Mind, a little recap.



Deryl (the name is NOT mispelled) Stephen is a teenager with a few issues. He has great powers of empathy .... so great, that he will occasionally experience other people's feeling exactly as they if they were his own.  The butler to his rich aunt and uncle is a drunk, so Deryl smashes the liquor before he goes on a binge. Deryl finds and stops a rape, and has to knock himself out before he exchanges one rapist for another.



And, oh, yeah, he's being contacted by space aliens.



So, one or two people have considered him more than a little insane, which is why his address at the start of Mind Over Mind is the local insane asylum.



Enter one Joshua Lawson, who's just there for the summer, a quick job before moving on to other things.  His method of therapy: accept the delusion, and teach patients to work within their own little world.



Which is a good thing, because it looks like some of Deryl Stephen's delusions are actively trying to kill him.



If I read the book correctly, it looks like Deryl's father came for a one-night stand from another galaxy, and Deryl had inherited a sacred position -- he is the all-knowing, all seeing Ydrel (I said the name wasn't misspelled), of the planet Kanaan.  The job of the Ydrel is to provide answers to anything asked of him.






Anthony Ainley from the
original Doctor Who

However, Kanaan is in the middle of an interplanetary war.



The people who ask Deryl for information think he's an angel to help them against their enemies – an alien race who thinks that their world is the promised land.



On the other side, there is "The Master," an alien who seems quite interested in training Deryl as a weapon ... and may get him killed doing it ....



However, every time I read about "The Master," I immediately saw Anthony Ainley from the original Doctor Who.



One would think that this would make for more than enough of a science fiction epic, and move on.  It's certainly a great foundation for it.



However, the book is mostly told from the perspective of Joshua Lawson, who has enough trouble with his new job. His boss hates him, especially when Joshua is right; and Joshua seems to be developing feelings for one of the nurses, Sachiko Luchese ...



Yes, the nurse is named like a cross between a General in the Japanese Imperial Army, and a mafia godfather -- something I suspect may have been done for the express purpose of one bad pun in the middle of the novel. But that's neither here nor there.



In fact, Joshua and Sachiko's romance takes up a good chunk of the plot, though it really doesn't mention "romance" on the back of the book.





Enough of the summary, time for the review (below the break).








Overall, I liked this book. The characters have great chemistry.
The three main characters click together like the pieces of a puzzle. The main cast effortlessly operates
like a well-oiled machine.  Even when the novel crosses over from
“mere” telepathy, and into aliens, the book works well, and
slides back and forth from one to the other with ease. Even the
dialogue with Deryl's  alien “handlers” is interesting. 





Mind Over Mind has a nice, complex plot. It's not
convoluted, and it's easy to follow, even after the introduction of
the two alien species, interoffice politics and personality clashes, and a bit of hospital soap opera.





These are the compliments, honest.





There's even a good, solid romantic
subplot that, miraculously, does not make me want to acid wash my
brain … and that's hard, even on a good day.  It was easy and
gentle, and there were little to no cliche's … I give a range
because that depends greatly on what you may consider a cliché. After all, there
are common traits to any bit of developing romance, and if that makes them cliché, well, they are cliché because they're true.





The interesting part is that the most evil character in the entire novel seems to be .... the hospital administrator, who not only believes Deryl's psychic powers, but tries to manipulate Deryl anyway he can. The Master and the ones who ask him for information are antagonists (neither are certainly helpful to Deryl's sanity), but the guy who runs the asylum is an evil little bastard.  I'd read the rest of the trilogy just to see if he gets thrown down a mine shaft or something.





Overall, I liked this book.  It's a good start for a trilogy, and I suspect the story will only get better when it's complete.  Right now, it feels like The Hobbit just waiting for The Lord of the Rings.




The only problem I foresee with the book is ... the description on the back of the book.  Mind Over Mind is less about two alien races at war, and more about three people on Earth. There's a love story, and (more or less) a coming of age story ... granted, most coming of age stories means coming to grips with the world around you, and coming into one's own.  In this case, Deryl's world has two alien powers in his head vying for control of his life as he tries to come into his own.



If your focus is more on epic science fiction war novels, this may not be the book for you ... yet.  I'll let you know when I read book two.




Basically, by the time everything is said and done, I want to read more about these characters and where they're going. 





I suspect you might too.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Interview with "Mind Over Mind" Author Karina Fabian





Yesterday, we had guest blogger Karina Fabian, author of Mind over Mind (editor of Infinite Space, Infinite God II, etc, etc) give us her views on writing science fiction.



Today, we get another shot at Madam Fabian, were we get to ask about her latest novel Mind Over Mind.  Because, apparently, she seemed to enjoy the last interview we had with her.





I'll see if I can do better this time .... muwhahahahaha....





Sorry, I had the switch jammed on "evil" for a moment....





Before we begin, the back cover of the book reads as follows:



Deryl
Stephen’s uncontrollable telepathic abilities have landed him in a
mental health institution, where no one believes in his powers.


But
when Joshua Lawson, a student of neuro linguistic programming, takes
part in a summer internship, he takes the unique step of accepting
Deryl’s reality and teaches him to work with it. As Deryl learns
control, he finds his next challenge is to face the aliens who have
been contacting him psychically for years—aliens who would use him
to further their cause in an interplanetary war.



On the one side of said war, there is Tasmae, the Miscria, of the planet Kanaan, who seeks out and contacts Deryl (not a misspelling, but the way) for information on everything from growing crops to making explosives (which goes over well in an insane asylum). On the other side is a being known simply as "The Master," who trains Deryl for combat, whether he wants it or not.

On with the interview .... (below the break)







1.This
novel has quite a history, doesn't it?





I started this in college as a short story for a science fiction class. I wrote it more out of spite than anything; my midterm paper got a B because the professor didn't like my analysis of some story I've long since forgotten. He loved the story and thought I should make it into a novel.

I spent the next year working on that novel, and even sent it out to several publishers, who all sent me very nice form rejections. So I gave it up, finished college, became an officer in the military, got married and had kids, then started a writing career.

In 2001, I was homeschooling two kids and had a toddler and a baby at home, so I decided to brush off the old novel and try again. I thought it'd be easy until I saw how, well, shallow it was. The character was a cool college Mary Sue with psychic powers, and Joshua was a hick sidekick. TRIPE! Ten years of living had given me some perspective, and I realized I needed to rethink the whole thing. I did love the premise, though, and Kanaan and Tasmae (known as the Miscria.) So I rethought poor Deryl until he ended up with a tortured history and was living in an asylum. Joshua became a protégée intern (and went from country hick to Black kid from the suburbs--don’t ask how; I don't question these things.) The book then had enough meat to become a trilogy. It took another ten years to find it a home, but I'm pleased as punch to have DragonMoon publishing it.

2.
What are the major differences between your original draft and the
current one .... the quality of writing aside, that is?


Characters are more complex, as is the plot. There are some important issues the characters are dealing with, from mental illness to abortions to attempted suicide. Frankly, it's just overall more fun to read, too.


3.
What would you say your inspirations were for 
Mind over Mind? If any.


To get read--by a lot of people. Thousands. Tens of thousands. (Help me out here, folks and buy it?)


To have the trilogy out in the next few years. DragonMoon has the second book, and I need to write the third next year.


4.
How much work did you put into the story itself before you started
writing? Was this outlined before the computer was even warm, or did
you just start writing?


I tend to be a seat-of-the-pants writer. I know the beginning, the end, and some of the stops on the way, but the characters lead me through the story. This one, of course, had the general idea written out with the college draft; but I am discovering so much great stuff as I write. I often imagine scenes for days or even weeks before starting, but because I'm writing another project at the time rather than because I'm waiting for it to gel in my mind. I sometimes write scenes or snippets in a file for safekeeping.


5.
Neuro-Linguistic Programming is a psychological concept you use in
the book as a way for Joshua to help Ydrel [Deryl] with his “issues.” How
much research into it did you have to do for the book?


Most of it came from a very interesting book called, Frogs into Princes, which I'd had to read in college and fortunately kept all those years. I also had an NLP therapist read the book to make sure I had accurately portrayed the use of NLP (at least within allowance for the fantasy setting.)


6. Back when you were interviewed for ISIG2, you mentioned how you were
more into fantasy than science fiction. Yet, you made this one a work
of science fiction, even using fantasy novels as a template in some
rather scientific uses. What made you decide to do this as SF, and
not fantasy?




That's funny; I've always thought of this one as fantasy, since Deryl has psychic powers. Sometimes the lines between fantasy and science fiction blur; this must be one of those times.

7
How much work went into designing the various alien cultures?


As much as has been needed for the story. I know that sounds like a snarky answer, but it's the truth. I spend a wonderful lunch hour with my astronomy professor in college playing with the orbits of the planets, but otherwise, the characters teach me their worlds as I write them. Barin came as a particular surprise as I neared the end of Mind Over Psyche. I had not imagined an underground world whose civilization collapses on a regular basis by an unknown natural disaster (which is really the Miscria of Kanaan using her telekinetic powers to push the planets apart from each other.)


8
So far, you edit Catholic SF anthologies, write novels on Zombie
exterminators and Rescue nuns, what are you going to write next?


Don't forget my dragon private detective! Live and Let Fly, the second DragonEye, PI novel, comes out April 2012 from MuseItUp books. I also have some children's books to revise and a spinoff form DragonEye about the Los Lagos police chief who will fall in love with a Faerie griffin who has been turned human to catch a murderer.


9
What, if anything, surprised you while writing
Mind
over Mind?


How vicious I can be to my characters? I've seriously messed with Deryl's mind, literally and figuratively. But he's so much more interesting this way!


10.
Do you have any advice to blog readers who are thinking about writing
their own novel?




If you don't sit down and write it, it won't get written. Start there.

11.
Last chance: What do you think is the one thing we should all
remember about
Mind
over Mind
?







That there will be a second book! In Mind Over Psyche, Deryl escapes the asylum, inadvertently taking Joshua with him. Deryl will meet Tasmae; Joshua will learn his has an ability of his own; Tasmae gets to go fabulously insane; and Deryl will at last confront The Master.








Bio
of Karina Fabian: 




Unlike her characters, Karina Fabian lives a comfortably ordinary life. Wife to Air Force Colonel Robert Fabian and mother of four, her adventures usually involve packing and moving, attending conventions, or giving writing and marketing advice in one of her many workshops. She's always had an overactive imagination, however, and started writing in order to quell the voices in her head--characters who insisted on living lives in her mind and telling her their stories. Winner of the 2010 INDIE award, winner and finalist for the EPPIE and finalist for the Global e-book awards, she's glad people enjoy reading the tales her characters tell.

Monday, September 12, 2011

Guest Blog: Karina Fabian on Writing Science Fiction.



Once upon a time, very long ago (okay, back in April), we had a guest blogger -- Karina Fabian, author of .... a whole lot of novels, and editor of Infinite Space, Infinite God II.



Guess what: she's back, with a new book, Mind Over Mind, a science fiction / fantasy piece (and there are reasons it's a bit of both), so I decided to keep her blog topic simple.




I asked her to blog "On the joys and wonders of writing SF."



She gave me a top ten list.



Here we go.....







Top Ten Reasons to Love Reading or
Writing Science Fiction




From the Home Office in FabianSpace






1. Explore Strange New Worlds.
Whether it's traveling to another planet, exploring the future, or
even seeing how the past would change if you altered some aspect
like, say sticking a small West Virginia town in the middle of the
Black Forest in 1632, you will find something completely new.





2. To seek out new life. This doesn't
have to mean alien life, either. A science fiction setting can give
new life to an old plot, or a new way at looking at our own society.
Recently, I revisited an old favorite, ALIEN NATION. A sci-fi cop
show from the 90s, it was really more about racial issues in a big
city.





3. To boldly go! It's sometimes
easier as a writer to explore a controversial issue in a way that
will make people think when you put it in a setting that's removed
from the present day society. Science fiction also gives you a means
to take chances. Nichelle Nicols (Uhura from Star Trek) was one of
the first black women on television to have a substantial role, and
was as a result a role model for thousands of women and Blacks.





4. Because it's part of our culture.
How many of you recognized the lines from the first three reasons?
We know without an explanation what someone means by warp speed. Ray
guns, transporters, aliens, time travel--none of these are unknown
concepts, even when they aren't everyday objects.





5. To explore the impossible. Or at
least the impossible right now. Did you know a lot of technology we
take for granted and are developing right now was first suggested in
science fiction? We have 3-D faxes--replicators! Arthur C. Clark
first talked about satellite communications years before we launched
our satellites. NASA is working on VASIMR drives for spaceships, and
Japan recently launched its first solar sail craft--ideas made known
in science fiction stories while still far-off theories in scientific
journals.





6. To explore ideas. How would humans
act if a plague knocked out 90 percent of the population? What if we
always fought wars through computers? What if humans could live
forever? What if you could go back in time--but only for eleven
minutes a shot? Some ideas can only be examined in a science fiction
setting.





7. You can learn a lot while enjoying
the adventure. Science fiction writers often have to do a lot of
research into everything from physics to genetics to animal sciences
in order to craft convincing stories. Writing is a great way to
learn things--but many times, much of that information comes out in
the text, too, and not in a boring "just the facts" manner
of a textbook.





8. We are a technological,
forward-thinking society. Why shouldn't our literature reflect that?





9. Resistance is futile. You will be
assimilated. Science fiction and fantasy are a big genre. Eighty
percent of the top grossing movies in the US are science fiction or
fantasy (source: http://www.irosf.com/q/zine/article/10131),
and the number of books--and readers-continues to grow.





10. It's sheer escapist fun. 'Nuff
said! 





****************************




About the Author: Karina Fabian










After being a straight-A student, Karina now cultivates Fs: Family, Faith, Fiction and Fun. From an order of nuns working in space to a down-and-out faerie dragon working off a geas from St. George, her stories surprise with their twists of clichés and incorporation of modern day foibles in an otherworld setting. Her quirky twists and crazy characters have won awards, including the INDIE book award for best fantasy (Magic, Mensa and Mayhem), and a Mensa Owl for best fiction (World Gathering). In May 2010, her writing took a right turn with a devotional, Why God Matters, which she co-wrote with her father. Mrs. Fabian is former President of the Catholic Writer’s Guild and also teaches writing and book marketing seminars online.




Sunday, September 11, 2011

Looking back on 9/11, ten years later.


[A more clinical and objective view can be found here.]



When I first walked into English class at St. John's University, it was a little before 9am. The professor was one Dr. Robert Forman.  He was always entertaining, and there's something about him that tells you he cares that you learn something in his class.



The first person I saw was my classmate Tony.  I said hello, and he asked, "Did you hear something about a plane running into the World Trade Center?"



And I laughed.  All I could think is what idiot could have missed noticing that there were two rather large buttersticks in the sky right in front of him?



I explained that to Tony.  He agreed, and I gave it no thought at all for the rest of the 90-minute class.



I went from one class to another -- Christian Spirituality and Mysticism, 10:40am, taught by a priest whose name I can't recall right this moment.  He was not only pleasant, but happy.  He was also very Italian, and joked about it often.



When I arrived, the professor wasn't there, and someone came into class saying that classes were canceled.



Huh.  That's odd.



I went to the nearest inter-university phone and called my father -- who was an Assistant Dean at SJU.  I called, told him my class was cancelled, and how are you doing?



"Come to the office."



Ok .... click.



Walking from one building to the other required that I cross from Marillac Hall, past Council and Newman Halls -- a narrow corridor outside that was as well directed as any sidewalk intersection without a traffic stop.



Ironically, it was afforded the best view of the Manhattan skyline that the University had to offer, without going into the university library --- SJU is, for the record, the highest point in Queens.



But, I didn't stop for a second. My pace was quick and even, mainly because there were so few people in my way -- for once.



Though there was one odd bit of business going on at the time, something I found odd even before I made it to my father's office: there were clusters of people with their cell phones out.  After the third such group, I felt like I was in a scene from Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds.



I walked into my father's office at the other side of the library, and before I could even open my mouth, my father said, "Planes have crashed into the Pentagon and the World Trade Center.  The twin towers are gone, and the Pentagon is burning."



And I remember this quite clearly, because I had a little red notebook with me at the time ... my first thought was "Didn't Tom Clancy already write this novel?"



My father suggested I go to the library, and observe the skyline.  by the time I got there, the library was locked.  So I walked back to the terrace I had just gone over.



Instead of a skyline, there were ground based storm clouds running from south to north.  I stood there for an unknown length of time, completely focused on it.  I didn't even notice my acquaintance Andy walk up next to me.



"I can't wrap my mind around it," he said.  "I can't believe they're gone."



 If I replied to him, I don't remember.









Much of what I had from that day I have preserved in my little red notebook -- a habitual writer's thing, a notebook.



I thought that Fr. Andrew Greeley was writing a column right that moment ... and he was, one that focused on the calmness of New Yorkers evacuating into New Jersey.



I thought that I had to rewrite my thriller novels, because one of them was a CIA assassin, and at that moment, I knew what she was doing at that exact moment in history.



I also knew that Osama bin Laden was a dead man walking. One way or another, someone was going to hunt him down, and shoot him.  Probably after he was hurt ... a lot.



On the way home, we had to drive around Union Turnpike, since the local park was a great site for emergency vehicles to assemble.



My family could only watch television that day because we had cable.  We must have watched the towers fall a dozen times by the end of the day.  There were theories that Camp David might be a target, because the Camp David accords had an anniversary that day, or soon.  And there was supposedly a car bomb outside of the state department.



The initial estimated dead: 55,000.  By 1pm, it had become 10,000.



At 6pm that evening, I was amused by a report.... four hours after the attacks in New York, parts of Kabul were burning. The Taliban were under attack. I wondered if (1) Mossad moved really fast, or (2), the dissidents wanted to get on our good side.  I would later learn that a leader of the Northern Alliance had been assassinated by the Taliban several days before, and that was their reprisal.





By that evening, there were 200 firemen missing, and 70 cops also MIA.



We had learned that there were people who jumped out of the towers rather than burn.



The next day, there was a pledge of support from Vladimir Putin.  Thousands of pints of blood were on the way from Israel....



And at 7:36 am on the morning of September 12th, the news had a good image of the Empire State building, with smoke in the background...



There was also no looting ... because this is not Los Angeles.  This is New York, where even the criminals were nice enough (or smart enough) to stay home.  There was a seven hour wait to give blood, until they were only those who were turned away.





We had shocking news: The NY Times said something nice about "the nazi," Mayor Rudy Guiliani, calling him Churchill in a baseball cap.



NY Governor Pataki had come down.  He thanked a fireman in critical condition for  his service, and the fireman said, "Well, what to you expect?"



And by night, there were so many who showed up with lit candles, the city looked like it was on fire.



By January 20, 2002, we had a count around 2,900 dead.



Ann Coulter made a statement that many were pissed off about: "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."

A quote which could be offensive if not for two things .... one: if you ever get a chance to read that article, you will notice that it was about mostly about a friend of hers, Barbara Olsen .... she was on a plane that flew into the Pentagon. So, she was annoyed.

When asked about it later, she told Fox news democrat Alan Colmes "We better convert them to something, even if it's what you call 'real Islam.' "

Which, frankly, converting the 10% of the muslim world that hate us (about 120 million, give or take) to something other than a sharia-variant would be a good idea.



My feelings about it were simple, and summed up by a quote from the tv show West Wing:


“We need to kill them, we need to find them and to kill them. We kill them. Then we find out who sent them and we kill them too. You kill the people who did it. You kill the people who planned it. Then you kill everyone who is happy about it….

I think at the end of the day, more people would rather have Ann Coulter's solution of converting people who want to kill us, even if it's to generic, Atlantic-avenue Islam, would be a better idea than my general feelings on the matter.

But, frankly, I don't think it's a matter of religion. Americans have protests and near riots over any civilian caught in a war zone. Instead, there were people who were having parties over 9-11; if someone feels happy about killing civilians, there is something wrong with that person as a human being. That person is about the same level as the average serial killer.

But, that was ten years ago .....


****



It's ten years later.





The cops and firemen who were there are being locked out of any 9/11 memorial.



They've locked out any and all priests from even showing up.



The cross forged from I-beams of the tower are being threatened by atheists with nothing better to do.



The unions who showed up in force to clear the rubble of the towers have started to turn it into a political freakshow.



Rye play land in New York has a "Muslim Day," and it turns into a riot because they banned all headgear from roller coasters.  This includes a a hijab -- something about not wanting the woman strangled or decapitated.



There are no replacement buildings yet.



And, damnit, I want a WTC with a missile battery.



Everyone likes to say never forget.



I hope this has made some people remember.

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Nerd Rage: DC Reboot as One More Day gone mad.

Let me start by saying that this title is horrifically overblown.

Everyone who has kept up with the blog (or has even read the top five most read posts)  knows my opinion on Marvel.  I dislike how they screw with characters for their movie properties, or dissolve marriages in an arbitrary and capricious fashion with a ... deal with the devil? For most of this, I initially blamed Joe Quesada ... then I realized that most comic book arcs are proposed a year in advance, and I realized that Marvel would be feeling the effects of Joe Q at least until 2012.

My main complaint was that Marvel had MASSIVE, WORLD CHANGING STORIES...... that changed absolutely nothing at all.

When I initially discussed DC Comics, and what they've been doing, my complaint was that they kept shaking up their universe so much, the dust never had time to settle before they had another damn crisis. We were being Evented to Death.

And now, DC is having yet another "event," where they rewrite large parts of their own history.

In the past, when DC did this sort of thing, it was to make life easier on everyone.  DC Comics had the original "Crisis on Infinite Earths" in the 1980s as a way of consolidating their myriad universes -- Golden Age, Bronze Age, Silver Age, the Dark Ages -- and make them one universe.

Now it's starting to feel like One More Day all over again. (more below the break)

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Terror is also a form of communication: Intimidating Characters

When I write a character, I like to have them a little vague.  This doesn't necessarily mean that they're all mysterious.  In fact, one of the most vague characters in A Pius Man, is the most blunt, and the most straightforward, and the person who's seemingly the most willing to tell you exactly what's on his mind.

Sean A.P. Ryan: mercenary,self-described cleanser of the gene pool, and he lists his resume in terms of property damage and body counts.

While blunt, Ryan doesn't necessarily have to be evil. After all, you have comic book characters like Wolverine who slash hordes to pieces all the time, and his kill count is probably somewhere in the thousands by now ... assuming he doesn't get rebooted into being a hippy....

But I digress.

However, in the case of Sean Ryan, he's working for the Vatican ... he's supposed to be training priests and nuns in nonlethal combat.  His third scene in the novel has Sean crippling an opponent -- not many people recover well from a shattered kneecap.

And people wonder why I make the Pope a suspect in A Pius Man ... if he's hired this lunatic, almost nothing could be put past him.

But, do you necessarily need violence for a good, intimidating character?  Heck no.  All you need is the implication that there will be very, very, very bad things that happen if someone crosses him/her.

Frankly, all you need is a reputation.

For example, take a clip from the tv show Doctor Who -- a series about a time traveling alien (there's a reason why there are Romans and spaceships in the same scene) ....

[more below the break]

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Characters answering surveys: Scott "Mossad" Murphy

Have you ever gotten an internet survey?  It has strange questions like your favorite foods, and flavors, that sort of thing.

Ever wondered what would happen if you had a novel character answer one of those?

I decided to have a little fun this week, so I decided to fill one of them out last week as my character Sean A.P. Ryan, mercenary, security expert, and weapon of mass destruction..  You've seen him mentioned on the sight, you've probably even read some of the short stories, including his "origin".

This week, I'm working on Scott "Mossad" Murphy, who you've also seen around the site a few times.

Yes, I'm a strange, strange person.....

***********