Vatican Ninja Remod (Draft) |
In this case, we're going to add a bit of local politics. And by local, I mean New York.
Has anyone heard of Occupy Wall Street?
If you haven't, that's okay, they're rather annoying -- essentially a fun bunch of anarchists hanging out in Zuccotti park who were told that 1968 was a really fun time, that bathing is bad for you, and it's quite okay to defecate wherever you deem fit. It's not so much a political movement as an unruly mob. They're mad as hell, they're not going to take it anymore, and they are rebels without a clue -- when someone says they hate Wall Street, and the bailouts of Wall Street, yet they don't protest anyone who was bailed out, this spells stupid to me.
They've attacked police officers, and they want the redistribution of wealth, but they whine when their stuff is stolen. At the end of the day, while they may appear threatening, they are mostly harmless. And if you read any of the links, you'll notice that I spend most of my time making fun of them. Just don't tell my editors, they may think I'm having too much fun.
So, what does this have to do with Catholic conspiracies?
Well, recently, I did a search on twitter for "Jesuits."
Big, big mistake.
Apparently, now, the Jesuits are a crypto-Jews / Nazi / Zionist organization, bent on establishing the New World Order via Occupy Wall Street .... And, of course, founded by the Illuminati.
As my friend Jason says,
I have to ask, now -- what are you people smoking? Or is it that the internet goes to the loudest spammers, who happen to be nutjobs with unlimited time on their hands.
"It's the internet. I'm not surprised about anything I find on it anymore. I think it was created by Cthullu, not Al Gore. It's a bottomless pit that WILL stare back at you if you look at it too hard. In the dark. On a cold winter night. With eerie music playing in the background (Cthullu has a MP3 player)."
Either way, it's always good to see that nothing ever changes.
The amusing part of the Occupy Wall Street movement as "crypto-Jewish Jesuit conspiracy" is twofold, really. One, they've got an emerging anti-Semitic group in there, with makes the whole "evil Jewish Conspiracy" part kinda stupid .... er.
On the other hand, their fellow occupiers have issues with breaking other people's toys.
How so?
I'll give you one guess.
Their international branch at "Occupy Rome," in addition to firebombing cars, has taken upon itself to smash up religious icons.
All I can think is: if this happened to a synagogue, would the Mossad have already killed everyone in this photo by now?
But, no, it's just the Catholics. So, who cares?
Ann Margaret Lewis, posted this to her facebook page and asked "Why?"
And isn't it obvious? Because Catholics are "evil, baby-raping priests," and most of these people are too busy worshiping their iPads . And they like to talk about how they should "eat the Rich"-- and the Catholics are wonderfully rich and powerful, aren't they? They have so many shiny things, after all.... And, somehow, the sarcasm isn't burning a hole in my keyboard.
And, sure enough, someone said just that, responding with two recent stories.** And by recent, I mean they happened the week before. The words are "innocent until proven guilty ... unless he's Catholic," aren't they? But, it's nice to see anyone can justify a hate crime is the target is "right."
But, thus far, Occupy Wall Street has endorsements from the Nazi party of America, the Communist party, and David Duke.
Between this and the above "evil Jesuit plot," it seems that a faceless, aimless rabble makes for a great Rorschach test for ideologists of any stripe. "Oh look, there's a group of angry protesters, they must hate who I hate," or "they embody everything I despise."
Vatican Ninja Chibi. "Grr. Arrgh" |
While it is quite entertaining to watch a group of people go slowly insane, it's time these guys ought to come up with a coherent message. Hell, the Tea Party's wants could be summed up as "We hate big government, we want fewer taxes, less spending and no Obamacare."
With the OWS, we have the Nazis, the Klan, the Communists, "we hate Jews / big business / brand names / we're wearing brand names/ we hate bailouts but won't protest those who got bailouts ...."
Oh, yeah, and they're an evil Jesuit conspiracy.....
Can I have my Vatican Ninjas now?
**The footnotes are below the break.
I'm using the responder's links.
One was about a priest, 78, with two strokes, who apparently abused two kids after said strokes, but somehow, he abused two kids, without any physical contact. How does that happen? He told them a dirty joke from 1945?
The other tale was about Kanses Bishop Finn, who found pictures on the priest's computer. However, that link does not tell the whole story either.
Ann Margaret Lewis noted the following:
The bishop first found pictures on a priest's computer, and brought them to the police as well as a lawyer, who told them "these are not child porn" (they were apparently artistic child nudes, that could be hung in a museum). They refused to arrest said priest since there was "no evidence." Ignore that the priest in question tried to commit suicide after the discovery.
Since this smelled to high Heaven, and no one would arrest the sucker, Bishop Finn removed said priest and put him somewhere where he was not to be around kids. The priest broke that confinement, at which point they checked the computer again and did find actual child porn that time.
If you read the link, Finn was arrested for not turning over the pictures fast enough. Considering that the police tossed the case out the first time, a delay of a few months sounds like the Bishop said "Screw it, we're going to talk to our lawyers, confirm that this is child porn," and lawyers bilking them.
Also note that Finn was convicted by a grand jury. In New York, the saying is that with a grand jury, the District Attorney can convict a ham sandwich. Also, in the link, Bishop Finn was out of the country at the time. Witnesses for a grand jury are subpoenaed, they cannot leave the country -- and since they are not arresting him for flight from arrest, that means he wasn't a witness at the grand jury! It's easy to convict someone who isn't there to defend himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment