Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Top ten Pius Blog posts, March 2014: Politics, sex, comic books, music.


At one point, it felt like that my blog's top ten posts changes.  Which is most popular and which aren't.



These are the top ten all time best blogs, as of now.






Sex and Comics?

1.  Who would Captain America Vote For? An election special. (October 29, 2012) Politics has been a major selling point for the blog, it seems.  When I did this blog post in time for the 2012 U.S. Presidential election, I had no idea that it would become so insanely popular. But then again, given the next one on the list, I guess it shouldn't have been too much of a surprise.



2. Sex, DC Comics, and ... wtf? (October 3, 2011) You remember this, right? It seems everyone has read it, probably twice. It was a study of DC Comics and their mistreatment of two of their better female characters. It includes, sex, sex, and more sex. And writing.  This is post is over two and a half years old now, and still going strong. I wonder why ....



For that answer, meet me over at #3...






3  Disasters to Marvel At: A Comic Discussion.  One of the longest-running posts on this list (Nov 8, 2010), and constantly in the top ten, this was a brief look at the past five to six years of Marvel Comics' history of absolute garbage. Looking at the top three, I need to find a way to make my blog about comic books, sex, and politics.



4. Snarky Theology 4: "Things that go boink in the night." See? Sex sells. I just need to find out how I can sell a book over how it's not sexualized. That should be fun.  Anyway, I can credit my friend Jason for this title. I mentioned I wanted the Catholic position on sex. The title was the first thing that leapt to his mind. I guess it worked.  This has been constantly popular since March of 2011. Maybe people are stopping by  JUST for the well thought-out theological discussion on the sexual nature of the human person.



Or sex.






Meet Mandy.
MY "SCF."

5. SFCS -- Strong Female Character Syndrome (August 19, 2013). This is the most recent post on the list, and it surprised me. It amounted to a simple rant of mine in which I ripped someone a new one over her idiotic interpretation of women in films. It had some valid points, but used the worst examples EVER.



I got your strong female characters right here for ya.



6. Self defense review: Zombies, Women's self defense, Barbara Sheehan (10/26/11).  I'm not sure why this one is so popular. All of the links are broken, and can't be fixed.



7. Someone has jumped the shark: women and military scifi (January 23, 2012). Tor, who seems to have become my favorite punching bag, decided to take an open-handed slap to their competition, mostly through libel.



Libel? How so? As in: "Oh, all of THOSE people are sexist, but WE are as pure as the driven snow".... give me a break.



Again, a blog about politics and sex ... sort of.



Maybe I really should find a way to make this blog about sex, politics and comic books.






8. Black Friday blog: Book shopping. On November 15, 2013, I tried to cash in for friends of mine, mostly because I really liked their books, and because people really needed to buy gifts. Books are always useful ... okay, and because I wanted to easily hock my books on twitter. Is that so wrong?  Apparently not, because a LOT of folks have shown up to take a look at this one.



9. Music: the Eye of the Storm: Fenton  This is a bit of a surprise. One part Cruxshadows, and one part killer sheep, this has been up since June 23, 2011 -- when I was going a little nutty on posting everything at once.




10. Writing A Pius Man, Part 5: A Love Story?  Okay, this one I can't explain. At all. I have no idea why people flock to this one. Is it because it's romance? Is it because it's about writing?  Is it because I used to have an amazingly stunning woman on the post? Maybe. 


Thursday, March 20, 2014

In Memory of Fred Phelps of the WBC: RIP or RIH


Ah, Fred Phelps is dead. Whatever could we say about a man who insisted hat God really hated everybody? Except for him and his incestuous cult of a family?



Well, we can briefly discuss what has been said about him.



When I first learned about Phelps and his merry band of vile creatures, my response was "Mr. Phelps, you are disavowed." I discussed his history, his attitudes, and how he's basically a pure, unadulterated schmuck.



I later discussed how the Supreme Court went through a lobotomy over these morons.



And then there was the day where I got into a fight with some of the little retards ... and if you insist that I'm picking on the autistic, you know what I mean, stop being a douchebag.



Then my last shot was NOT God Hates .... Superman? a short story.  Completely not about Phelps at all. Honest. Would I lie?



We could all hope that he rests in peace. However, if he's as unrepentant in death as he was in life, then we can replace RIP with RIH -- rot in Hell.

Monday, March 10, 2014

Dear Forbes, you need some nerds.


The following blog post is rated R, mostly for language.



Last week, Forbes decided to weigh in on the whole Agents of SHIELD writing with this article, that claimed that "Had it been this show [that fans wanted] out of the gate, it would have failed catastrophically."



Really? Well, what does Forbes think that fans wanted in the first place?


Had the series come out of the gate with nothing but major universe tie-ins, the series would have tanked before episode two because it would have said to the viewing public “we’re only going for hardcore fans of the MCU right now.”

Major universe tie-ins? What?



Um, how do I break this to Forbes?  Oh, yeah. WE DIDN'T WANT MOVIE TIE-INS! We wanted the Marvel Universe writ small. There was not been one, single, teeny-tiny hint that there's an actual Marvel universe out there independent of the films until seven episodes in. Instead, now, at this late date, we're getting movie tie-ins? If I wanted a movie tie-in, I'd petition for Peter David to write novelizations of the films again.



I try not to swear, but I call BULLSHIT.



BULLSHIT. BULLSHIT. BULLSHIT.



This entire article is a collection lame excuses, and even if I believed a single one of them, there is no reason on God's green Earth for Agents of SHIELD to have taken so damn long.  As of last week, March 4th, we were 14 episodes in; by this time in a single season of Buffy, or Arrow, or practically any other series with "a plan," we have some idea of who the bad guy is, what their motivations are, and a hint of their sinister plot.



Instead, we have had a creepy sex subplot with Ming-Na and someone young enough to be her son, we still have no idea about Coulson's death (not really), they spent a lot of time with awkward scenes of bad guys talking to each other, yet still lacking any character, and this garbage could have been compressed into half the time.



Don't believe me? Do you really think that "This couldn't have happened immediately"?



So we needed a "second pilot"? We needed the Island of Dr. Quinn ("The Asset")? We needed two-dimensional characters, writing as witless as 24, season 6, and a boatload of writing and episodes that went NOWHERE?

[more below the break]







Tell me right now why the viewing order couldn't have been:



Pilot (different ending: blowup Mike Peterson)

The pyrokinetic (The return of not-A.I.M. in "The Girl in the Flower Dress")

Either The Hub or The SHIELD academy (a solid murder mystery with some character development)

The painfully obvious ratings grab with the Thor 2 tie-in and the not-Wrecking Crew, starring Peter MacNicole ("The Well")

The Magical Place (We get a new timeline on Coulson's death)

The killer train (T.R.A.C.K.S. Surprise! Deathlok!), as a mid-season cliff-hangar

T.A.H.I.T.I. (last week's episode) where we actually introduce comic book SHIELD agents



Seven episodes, all of the good stuff, none of the boring crap, their vaunted "slow buildup," and we'd even have the blatant Thor tie-in AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE AND TIME (November, when the Thor sequel came out).  This is half of the freaking show.  I could make the argument to keep the academy episode or the Island of Ian Quinn, if they actually follow through on anything laid down in those episodes, but I won't hold my breath.  That's still five brain-numbing hours that I want back, closer to seven.



Should we even discuss the upcoming episode that's a blatant dove tail to the Thor: The Dark World DVD release?



And there's still no reason for coming up with a team of "original characters," who are all about as original as the stereotype cookie-cutters they were produced from.



Forbes need some actual nerds on the staff who know what the fuck they're talking about, and I don't mean statisticians and stock analysts, I mean people who read comic books.  Is that so hard?



How could this have been done better?



Let's look at another comic book tv show: Arrowcentered around DC comics' Green Arrow. The first SCENE in Arrow has DC comic references. For anyone who has ever looked at the comic books for an hour (I may have spent four minutes), it's clear that someone has paid attention.  No, it's not fan service, fan service, fan service faithfulness to the comics – but there was enough to show that, yes, the writers are respecting the original material without being chained to it.



And then there's Marvel's Agents of SHIELD, with the forced references to the Marvel movie universe. Which is sort of strange, don't you think? Marvel has seemingly endless B- and C-list characters to draw on, and they used … no one.



But we needed time!



Again, tell it to Arrow; with a half-dozen nods to the comics in the first episode, AoS can not make any such excuses. However, since Jeph Loeb (last seen destroying Heroes) is running the series into the ground, I'm quite willing to blame him for everything. There's an entire universe to play with, and he's barely using any of it.



Like I said before, why bother making "original characters?" Marvel has a pilot named Wyatt Wingfoot... we needed someone new to fly the plane? Can't you see a modified Frank Castle (the Punisher) as being a slightly older field agent who “had a little breakdown a while back, he's better now”?  If they needed female agents, why not use Spider-Woman? Silver Sable? Jessica Jones? All of whom were deep, complex, yet badass females who do not have powers, (Spider-Woman has been de-powered so often, no one would blink if she didn't have them on the show).



With the occasions people have asked for lawyers, is there one reason they couldn't have name-dropped Jennifer Walters (She-Hulk)? Or Matt Murdock (Daredevil)? Marvel even has their own reporter for superheroes … so why didn't we just have her be the Skye character, only with social media instead of dead-tree media?



You see, Forbes, we don't want much, and we don't need much. There are plenty of little things that could have been done from day one.  Heck, even though the first appearance of Nick Fury, at the end of Iron Man, said "You've just taken your first step into a larger universe," the series has made it perfectly clear that there isn't a larger universe to be had.



Forbes apparently don't have any staff nerds, and they've never seen Arrow. While the occasional cameos were amusing, what we all wanted was melding the *general* world of weird that is the MCU (Marvel Comic Universe) in with the show.



In short, we wanted a Joss Whedon show, not a Jeph Loeb show. We wanted the Whedon wit and vibrant characters.  Even Xander of Buffy the Vampire Slayer had more character in the pilot than most of these folks do, half a season in.  They're sort of white bread ... and by that, I mean bland and generic.




The saving grace of the series since day one has been Agent Coulson, and he's what has me coming back week after week. Ming-Na's Melinda "The Cavalry" May had been interesting, then she and the "young hot thing" Grant Ward started having sex (she's 22 years older than he is. Just... eeh).



After the awesomeness that is Arrow, AoS is pissing me off with
it's cliche` characters, its weak overall story arc, the cheap and obvious
attempt to insert romantic tension, and its inability to incorporate the
Marvelverse. Joss Whedon's name has been slapped on this as a selling point, but
it's obvious he's not involved in any of the writing, the characters, or
anything about AoS, really.



Someone send the message to Forbes. We don't want a movie tie-in series, we want a Marvelverse, characters we care about, the wit and wisdom we got from Buffy, and the basic Whedon magic. Not a Heroes retread.


Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Who wants a free book?


So, how do you get a free copy of A Pius Legacy?





Well, you remember how free Kindle copies work?  I set a specific promo day
for everyone to download a free copy.  Those copies downloaded count on Amazon
in the "members who have bought X item have also bought Y."  Well, while that's
all well and good, Amazon does not allow that to happen until you get 40 reviews
on you novel. Yes, you heard me, 40 reviews.  And I'm going to take a wild shot
in the dark that all the reviews had better be good ones.




Right now, I'm halfway there.  Last year, over a thousand (okay, 1400)
people picked up a copy of A Pius Man via the free Kindle day, and I've gotten
20 reviews.  Count 'em, 20.  And some of these I've had to ask for, some of them
have been really recent.



So, if you want a free copy of A Pius Legacy .... just review A Pius Man.  The point of free Kindle copies is to drum up PR. Let's start, shall we?




I start the free promo days on A Pius Legacy right after I hit 40 reviews on A Pius Man.
 Preferably positive. :)



This doesn't necessarily mean you have to wait.  Go write a review, post it
at Amazon, and come back here and comment, or email me at DeclanFinnInc@aol.com and I will personally
send you a Kindle copy of A Pius Legacy.  Those 20 people who have already read
it have gotten (or will be getting) their own copies, one way or another.

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Writing "A Pius Legacy"



So, as I mentioned yesterday, A Pius Legacy was book two of the 800-page monstrosity that was the original A Pius Man.



You want to know the real interesting part? A Pius Legacy was actually only 60 pages of the original book.



At which point, you have to wonder, "Um... did you just admit you padded 60 pages of plot with 200 pages of nothing?" Not really.



Keep in mind, a book becomes a very fluid thing after a while.  Especially when you're breaking up one book into three. You can't just pull a Lord of the Rings, write a one-page summary of book one, and then keep going with book two. For those of you who didn't read the novels, the movie Fellowship of the Ring ended where the novel The Two Towers began.



So if I can't do that, what can I do without making the first half of book two a retread of book one? Legacy follows hot on the heels of A Pius Man, so it's not like I can say that it's "a few months later."



However, I can tell the story from someone else's point of view.  Remember, a lot happened in APM, and a lot of people were shot at.  Not everyone knows everything. So, if I take the same events from a different point of view, I get a fresh perspective.



Second? There's the United Nations aspect. Remember who the ultimate villains of A Pius Man were. If you didn't read it, well, let's just say that these aren't people you just arrest. You have to have a heavy hitter take them down. You need an international authority to go after international villains. Could the United States do it? Nope. Why? For five different reasons. Some involve the villains themselves, some involve the individual politicians in this universe. We have to make the case for action.



So, the recap is done. Check.



Now what? Here's where the politics comes in. When you're essentially dealing with national enemies, public relations will be key. However, I have to use the right person as the public campaign for what happened in A Pius Man, or we're going to have a lot of problems. Let's face it, some of these people are as subtle as a sledgehammer. Some of them are spies who can't afford to go on MSNBC, CNN or Fox.



Oh, yeah, and remember, the other side uses mercenaries who have no problem killing civilians who get in their way.



When I write, I try to give new meaning to the phrase "killer interview."



How else to expand the novel? Simple -- A Pius Man had enough characters for Fellowship of the Ring, surely I can give them their own subplots. I killed family members in the last book. I killed friends. I shot one of my main characters half to pieces. There's a double agent that hasn't really been dealt with. I have tons of people to play with, areas to explore, and really mean things to do to my characters.



What do I do to these poor, unfortunate souls that have the misfortune to land in my novel? You'll see.  But it's going to hurt.

Monday, January 27, 2014

Why are sexist books best sellers?


Women in novels:

How I see them.
Yes, I've injected some gross hyperbole into that title.  I don't like throwing around terms like "sexism," since I think the term's been overused to the point where it's almost meaningless (like the term "fascist" just means anyone who doesn't agree with you online).



However, these are some books that hit it really fricking big in the last few years, and that still confound friends of mine with their popularity, and even with their very existence.  This might count as a rant, but, damn it, some of these things are stupid. And wrong.



Now, keep in mind, I haven't read any of these books, but I've been told about them, researched them a little, and every stupid little thing I've seen has amounted to one great big question: Who the Hell is reading these books and why?



If you remember the "Strong Female Character" blog, you can see this as a bit of a sequel.  We've gone from fully fleshed out, well-developed, kick-ass women .... to this.  Books that treat women like crap, and they're made into bestsellers.... by women!



Twilight .... Where do you start with Twilight? Maybe over at RM Hendershot's blog, where she discusses how the main characters have little to no personality, and there's almost no plot at all.



Maybe with my friend Annie (wife of my co-author from Codename: Winterborn) noting that "Vampires are going crazy over blood from a paper cut. why aren't they going insane every time the heroine has her period? Have we forgotten that teenage girls have periods?"  Or, another of her sayings, "Vampires don't sparkle! They immolate!"



Another quarter is an online fellow named "The Nostalgia Critic" on YouTube, who sums up Bella Swan like this .... (WARNING: R-rated language ahead.)







I think Twilight was summed up for me in a matter of minutes when I tripped over the movie played on cable. Two characters were in a diner, and the vampire explained to our hapless nimrod (named "Bella") that he could read the mind of every person in the diner except for her.


Bella: "What's wrong with me?"

Vampire: "I tell you I can read minds, and you ask what's wrong with you."

That's it. Twilight, summed up by its own content.




A friend of mine on Facebook once asked how the last book/movie ended for Twilight.  I had been told through another acquaintance, so I informed her.  My friend replied: "Stop making fun of me."  I kid you not. She didn't know I was being deadly serious.





After decades of women's equality (I'm Irish, our women have been ass-kickers even in our mythology), going from Equal Pay for Equal Work, to Rosie the Codebreaker (the codebreakers from World War II who would staff the NSA) to every strong female character on television, to .... Bella Swan?  And teenage girls are even allowed to read this garbage?  And adult women buy these books in droves?





When did we fall off the merry-go-round? [Answer below the break]






Girl with The Dragon Tattoo.  This is the one where the post title is almost certainly hyperbolic.  I don't know an awful lot about this one, but every time I hear something about it, I'm turned off even further. Yes, it's about a rebellious young female computer hacker and a journalist looking at underground sex clubs... Yeah, you see that last part? That's where you lost me.



Then I'm told, "Oh, but the writing, it's sooooo good.  There was this really well done rape scene that was a chapter long and --"



Wait? A what?  Who writes a rape scene for a whole chapter? Is it just me, or it that a form of sadism on the part of the writer, and masochism on the part of the reader who puts up with it?



If you're not exactly following my line of thought on this, well, let me elaborate.  I don't care how "well done" a rape scene is written, RAPE IS NOT A FORM OF ENTERTAINMENT. EVER, IN ANY CONTEXT.



Mayhaps I should back up a bit? I have, in my life "collected" rape victims -- meaning that I have encountered people who have informed me with stories of being raped. Notice I said "people," there are two guys in this list. This list is at ten people.  Imagine that, would you? Listening to the guy who was assaulted with a broom handle, the girl who was kidnapped on California by an online associate, the one who was gang raped, the two who were date-raped, or the three who were molested by relatives...



I don't care how well the story's told. I'm not going to find rape and underground sex clubs entertaining.



50 Shades of Grey -- While I have no read this one, I have heard audio clips of people reading from it. The point of the audio clips is to show exactly how bad the book is written.



Premise: a bored housewife signs a contract to enter into a dominant-submissive relationship with a billionaire.  There is sex..... The end.



The truly bewildering part of this is the audience for 50SoG -- women.  There's a reason this is referred to as "mommy porn."  So, in 100 years, we've gone from Equal Pay for Equal Work to "tie me down, spank me, treat me like a slave"?



Really? Really?  How about no. Just no.



Now, before you ask, no, I'm not necessarily against all sex in novels ... just make sure sex is used in a context where it adds to the story.  However, when sex is the story .... why bother buying it? It's called porn, and easily accessible online...



No, I'm sorry, it's called "erotica," also easily available online.  Don't believe me? Even I can find some websites that can cater to every taste on the planet, from romance to bondage, to fantasies over your favorite celebrities, and some of them STILL have better characterization and plot than this lousy novel.



It's porn. And on top of that, it's lousy porn.  "Good" porn you can at least laught at. Hell, nowadays, porn parodies have as much content as the source material.  50 Shades is just awful.



And yet, in print on demand publishing (pre-"brick and mortar publisher"), this book sold a quarter of a million copies.  For those of you who prefer numerals, that's 250,000 books sold, with at least a million dollars of profit.  Shoot. Me. Now.



I think the last word on the subject came from a story told by an agent acquaintance of mine on Facebook. Usually referring to it as "Fifty shades of poop," one of the authors she represents is quoted as saying "I could eat alphabet soup and defecate a better novel."



And yet, at the end of the day, we've got sites like the NewStatesman whining about how female characters like Buffy aren't really developed characters, they're merely "strong."



Well here's the other end of the spectrum.  And between a one-dimensional character like Bella Swan, or books like 50Shades, I'll take a two dimensional Xena, or a comic book Black Widow any day of the week.

Monday, January 6, 2014

Review: the tv season thus far



This is going to be a little odd, but this review was inspired by... well, the fact that we have such bloody good television on right now. And I mean surprisingly good, with strong writing, tight plots, deep universes, and intelligent character moments that jump up and bite you.




Walk with me through my television viewing.




Arrow: Where can I start with this show? The writing is great on the character level, the episode level, the season level and the series level (they obviously have a plan here, and it shows).  I started out thinking that this was going to be incredibly weak.  I mean, Oliver Queen? The comic book version was the uber-Leftist twin of Batman who dressed like he was rejected from a Robin Hood remake. The television show, on the other hand ... yikes, what don't they do? This season (#2) has, so far, given every supporting character and guest star some great moments, from flashes of intellect, deductive reasoning and sheer bad-assery (that's a word, really); we've also had appearances by Solomon Grundy, the rise of Deathstroke and Barry Allen, and Ra's al-Ghul has managed to deeply effect the show just by the mention of his name. There is very much a DC universe out there, and it's all out to get Oliver Queen.



And then there's....[more below the break]





Agents of SHIELD: The only weak link in the chain.  You can read my longer review of this show, but it boiled down to "cautiously optimistic." Almost nothing has changed since my initial review, except for some character story lines that are a little strange, and one really strong story that "tied in" to Thor: The Dark World by cleaning up the film's aftermath, then coincidentally handling an Asgardian threat that pops up at the exact same time while also having nothing whatsoever to do with the events of the actual film.



And then, because apparently someone decided that this needed sexing up, someone wrote a love affair between the young hotshot spy (played by Brett Dalton) and the Veteran operative (Ming-Na Wen). It wouldn't bother me as much if it was more like a May-October romance instead of a March-November one (he is 28, she is 50). Now, I don't necessarily have a problem with dating someone older. I'm currrently seeing someone who's 11 years older than I am. A 22 year age difference, though, is when I have issues. (When the actress was first on ER in 1993, he was 7 years old).



As for the rest of the deep, character-rich Marvelverse .... actually, it's starting to piss me off with how little there is of the Marvel universe. I want to know how much this has to do with Jeph Loeb being the same silly screw up he was on Heroes, and how much this is Marvel studios insisting on holding back comic characters for ... wait for it ... NetFlix! After the awesomeness that is Arrow, AoS is pissing me off with it's cliche` characters, its weak overall story arc, the cheap and obvious attempt to insert romantic tension, and its inability to incorporate the Marvelverse. Joss Whedon's name has been slapped on this as a selling point, but it's obvious he's not involved in any of the writing, the characters, or anything about AoS, really.




Note to Marvel: Agent Coulson does NOT hold a tv show together all by himself.




Almost Human. This was a straight-up surprise.  The "cop with cyborg partner" has been done on tv before, but this one is surprisingly well thought-out.  There may be an overall plot, but they're not pushing it, and they've managed to make some interesting "new" crimes with science fiction spins to them. Selling organs on the black market? How about mechanical hearts that have been taken from corpses, resold, and rigged to shut off if extortion payments aren't met? It has been a delightful surprise, with a lot of innovative little things that are constantly scattered through the entire series. The little things impress me, mainly because it shows that they're putting an effort in making the details.



As Michelangelo once said, trifles make perfection, but perfection is no trifle.



I'm also waiting for Karl Urban to say, "Damnit Jim, I'm a cop, not a physician," but that may never happen.



The Black List: This boils down to James Spader playing Hannibal Lecter.  Seriously, it's James Spader as a master criminal middle man who has decided, for reasons of his own, to start helping the FBI go after the bad guys who are so good at their jobs that no one has ever heard of them. And, let's face it, James Spader has never needed to act in his life.  As for the Lecter part... come on, Spader comes with his own glass box here.  It's fun watching James Spader now that he's no longer working with David E. Kelley. The overarching plot is a essentially a sort of mystery that the audience gets to work through as we go along.



Blue Bloods.  This one strikes my fancy because it's a very New York show.  Centered around three generations of a cop family, you have a good strong New York vibe here.  Granted, some of the issues addressed are ripped from the headlines, and they're addressed in some interesting and inventive ways. It's a police procedural, but it's centered around family.  And, strangely, this has gotten to be a better show as the series stops using season-long story arcs, which I find surprising.






Castle: A New York cop show with witty banter, smart writing and even a romance subplot that continues even into the engagement stage?  Oh, hell yes. I can't remember the last time I saw a tv show even try to follow a relationship this deeply. Nathan Fillion is playing (mostly) Nathan Fillion ... though there are times when he or his are threatened, and he becomes dark and angry, and channeling his inner Mal Renolds.  Then there's his co-star, Stana Katic, who is the only woman I've ever seen act with micro-expressions.  It's one of the few shows I've watched in reruns, and I'm still catching things I've missed.



At the end of the day, I think the romance story arc is one of the more impressive things about this show. While most shows decide it's time to end the series when the main characters get together, Castle has decided to just keep going with it into the engagement stage, including getting drama out of relationship problems that frequently come up.  And the secondary cast has been loaded with strong character moments, sometimes devoting whole episodes to the "sidekicks," allowing characters to show different sides of themselves.



Dracula: If AoS is the weak link in this chain, this show was almost dead on arrival.  Too much gratuitous sex, way too much soap opera, almost no action to speak of, this show had three or four episodes before I fully gave up on it. If you look at the show Revenge, which is The Count of Monte Cristo in the Hamptons of the 21st century, you can see everything that Dracula has ripped off: a revenge plotline, the take-down of the week, odd interpersonal relationships, a snarky sidekick.  However, unlike Revenge, Dracula has no charm, an angsty, broody character with no sense of humor, and no one is having fun here.



Dracula was so bloodless, I thought I was watching Twilight.






Grimm. The premise looks like a cross between the comic book Fables and Buffy the Vampire Slayer. A "Grimm" in this case hunts down fairy tale monsters, only these creatures are called Wesen, and they have a surface appearance of standard human. Basically, imagine if Buffy had her powers kick in after she had been promoted to homicide detective. For a series that started at the same season as Once Upon A Time (which is just a rip off of Fables), I didn't expect much from this show.  However, it's only gotten better and better as the show has gone on, with strong character back stories, universe design, and great pacing.  It has romance -- with two strangely adorable couples -- and nothing is easy. Someone new trips over the universe of weird? It take at least four episodes to get completely adjusted. Couple meets and falls in love? It takes a year to move forward.  There is a deep and rich universe in here, and they have no problem with taking their time to explore it deeply.



NCIS / NCIS: LA: In the case of both shows, while their police procedural aspect has remained strong, I actually think I like what they've been doing with their characters.  NCIS as a new element that's fun to watch, and NCIS: LA has decided that their "stars" (Chris O'Donnell?  LL Cool J?) are not the primary focus, and has made it much more of an ensemble cast, introducing two series-long romantic subplots and character arcs.  They've got some interesting tricks up their sleeves, and they're having fun playing with the formulas they've used since day one.



The Mentalist: If Sherlock Holmes was raised as a carney, he would be Patrick Jane, the protagonist of this show.  Having joined the ranks of homicide solving cops in order to hunt down the serial killer who murdered his wife and daughter, Patrick Jane made a living as a successful consulting detective.



This season, Jane found the killer, known as Red John, and then ran away from his life. While this would normally be the end of any show, Jane (played by Simon Baker) carries this show with wit and charm, and finesse.  He's a likeable sort, and fun to watch.And let's just say that he allowed us to sympathize with the killer as he's slowly choking the life out of someone....



No, Red John did not get a trial. And I'm fine with it.






Person of Interest:  This one in an interesting show, not just for the premise, but for the people involved. The idea is simple: every bit of intelligence gathered by the US government is filtered through an artificial intelligence that can predict acts of terror, murder, any major crime planned in advance. However, in order to protect the privacy of the population, all domestic crimes are ignored. If you ain't a terrorist, the computer isn't supposed to care. Our heroes have a back door, and they only have one clue: a social security number of either the victim or the perpetrator.  Take one computer nerd, and a SpecOps shooter who should be playing Batman, and you have one fun show. In its third season, much of the character arcs thus far have been shown in flashbacks, to show you how these people used to be.  In this case, that works, because most of the characters are in their late 30s and early 40s, so it makes sense that they were people before we met them.  Now that we've seen who they were, and how they've become who they are, now we get to see how they continue to evolve. Now, major characters are finally allowed to have character development in the present. Though they've recently killed off one of the major players, it's been used to great effect for various and sundry character moments, sometimes from the most surprising cases.



This one is actually one of John Ringo's favorite tv shows. As he put it, the characters are spot on, and he can't see some of these plots coming.



And Jim Caviezel is already playing Batman on this show, why did they get Ben Afleck?






Notice that the first word

in bold is CRAZY.

Sleepy Hollow. This one might just be considered a guilty pleasure. If Ichabod Crane was a British spy who changes sides and joined the American revolution, who "died" while beheading a Hessian mercenary, then brought back in the modern day to fight the same mercenary (still without his head) .... it's interesting. And you can tell that most of the scenes with the headless horseman (who, in this version, is Death, horseman of the apocalypse) have been inspired by the firefight in the police station from The Terminator....



You can understand why more than one review has described this show as jumping on the crazy train and refusing to let go. Despite everything I've just written, the series is surprisingly coherent. It's witty, it's stylish, and, sadly, despite the heavy fantasy elements, it has enough facts about the American revolution to make it qualify as educational. I've got some issues with our heroes being the two witnesses from the book of Revelations (Really? Didn't Dexter do that in season 6?), and let's not even go into the "good witches" concept they have floating around, but I've let it go and jumped aboard the crazy train myself.



Revenge (2011)Revenge: mentioned above, Revenge is a delightfully evil little show.



Once upon a time, a man was framed for blowing up an airplane, leaving his little girl orphaned and alone. And then she grew up, inherited a boatload of money from owning half the founding stock of Apple, and started destroying everyone involved in the frame up, one at a time.  There will be payback, and we will have fun along the way.  It's one of the more intelligent revenge plots I've seen since The Count of Monte Cristo, only these plans don't go as smoothly as Edmond Dantes' did.



This is another show where the secondary characters have development, and usually along lines that defy the cliche`. At the end of the day, this feels like a spy drama disguised as a soap opera.



There are some other great shows out there, of course. CSI (ok), Criminal Minds (still pretty good), Elementary (good, maybe not great), Hawaii 5-0 (just plan fun),  but they haven't really jumped out at me from their usual awesome performances.



It's going to be an interesting season.